According to Jones, this premise is false (2010). A study by Smith, Doe and Rowell indicates that this is only a misconception (2002).
This premise is false (Jones, 2010). Even though it was previously accepted as fact, this is only a misconception (Smith, Doe & Rowell, 2002).
Erikson claims otherwise (1999). Some experts claim otherwise (Erikson, 1999). Research shows that this long-held belief is “nothing more than an old wives’ tale, at best” (Johnson & Smith, n. d. ).
Many wonder if the facts have been exaggerated (Doe & Simmons, 2009; Williams, 2007).
Recent research on the brain supports these claims (“New News about the Brain,” n. d. ). The study of psychology continues to expand in this area (Psychological Discoveries, 2012).
According to Jones, this premise is false (25). A study by Smith, Doe and Rowell indicates that this is only a misconception (98-100).
This premise is false (Jones, 25). Even though it was previously accepted as fact, this is only a misconception (Smith, Doe, and Rowell, 98-100).
Erikson claims otherwise (27). Some experts claim otherwise (Erikson 27). Research shows that this long-held belief is “nothing more than an old wives’ tale, at best” (Johnson and Smith 28-31). New information clarifies this situation (Doe 18, 23).
Current lingual theory supports this concept (L. Hoffman 87), but some linguists disagree (M. Hoffman 14). L. Hoffman supports this concept (87), but M. Hoffman disagrees (14).
Recent research on the brain supports these claims (“New News” 4-5). The study of psychology continues to expand in this area (Psychological Discoveries 58).
Doe holds to this belief (“Theories on Literature” 92-4), but he has been known to stray from it on occasion (Analysis of Popular Poems 100). This theory is “too new to hold much ground” (Analysis of Popular Poems 100), but it does show considerable promise (Doe, “Theories on Literature” 92-4).
Many wonder if the facts have been exaggerated (Doe and Simmons 204; Williams 17-21).
Williams firmly states his support for this new artistic movement (“Film Trends”). This new artistic movement has professional support (Williams, “Film Trends”).
This information is considered fact by all but a few critics. 1 Doe believes this to be false. 2
1. Robert Smith and Kevin Williams, Studies on the Human Condition (New York: Big Time Press, 2012), 4-14. 2. John Doe, “A New Perspective” (New York: Major Journal, 2011), 18.
1. Robert Smith and Kevin Williams, Studies on the Human Condition (New York: Big Time Press, 2012), 4-14. 2. Ibid. , 34. 3. John Doe, “A New Perspective” (New York: Major Journal, 2011), 18. 4. Robert Smith and Kevin Williams, Studies on the Human Condition, 67.
Doe believes this to be false (“A New Perspective” [New York: Major Journal, 2011], 18). “This idea is entirely false” (John Doe, “A New Perspective” [New York: Major Journal, 2011], 18).
The job outlook for this profession appears positive (U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook [Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2013]). 18. U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook (Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2013).
